Bibliometric evaluation of Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia (2013-2022)

Abstract The Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, published since 1925, is the most influential dermatological journal in Latin America, indexed in the main international bibliographic databases, and occupies the 50th position among the 70 dermatological journals indexed in the Journal of Citations Reports, in 2022. In this article, the authors present a critical analysis of its trajectory in the last decade and compare its main bibliometric indices with Brazilian medical and international dermatological journals. The journal showed consistent growth in different bibliometric indices, which indicates a successful editorial policy and greater visibility in the international scientific community, attracting foreign authors. The increases in citations received (4.1 ×) and in the Article Influence Score (2.9×) were more prominent than those of the main Brazilian medical and international dermatological journals. The success of Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia in the international scientific scenario depends on an assertive editorial policy, on promptly publication of high-quality articles, and on institutional stimulus to encourage clinical research in dermatology.

Actualizando el sistema; capitalismo cognitivo y semiocapitalismo / Updating the System; Cognitive Capitalism and Semiocapitalism

El conocimiento en las sociedades digitalizadas se torna aceleradamente efímero, obsolescente y competitivo. Así, los roles de sus académicos se ven sometidos a una existencia precaria; se esfuerzan por acumular capital semiótico a través de factores de impacto ­fácilmente cuantificables­ que desdibujan el valor cualitativo de lo cognitivo. Es en esta trama que terminan inscribiéndose las universidades del siglo XXI; la mayéutica de Akádêmos comienza a desdibujarse tras la competitividad burocrático-empresarial del capitalismo cognitivo

Knowledge in digitized societies rapidly becomes ephemeral, obsolescent and competitive. Thus, the roles of its academics are subjected to a precarious existence; they strive to accumulate semiotic capital through impact factors ­ easily quantifiable ­ that blur the qualitative value of the cognitive. It is in this plot that the universities of the XXI century end up registering; Akádêmos's maieutics begins to blur behind the bureaucratic-business competitiveness of cognitive capitalism

Significado de la indexación de la Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia a Scopus

La Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia (RPGO) ha obtenido su inclusión en la importante base de datos Scopus. En una rápida recopilación de la publicación de la revista, se recuerda la dedicación editorial de sus seis editores, cuatro de los cuales acababan de presidir la Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología (SPOG). Los momentos iniciales de trabajo editorial fueron realizados manualmente, en máquinas de escribir y visitando la imprenta continuamente, así como a los patrocinadores. El compromiso de los Comités Directivos de SPOG para financiar la publicación y distribución de los ejemplares permitió la gradual indexación a bases de datos locales, regionales e internacionales. Su internalización se amplió desde la publicación de la RPGO en el Open Journal Systems (OJS), sistema informático donde se publica los artículos con puntualidad, calidad, incluyendo sus características editoriales y la Información para los Autores. Ahora la publicación es solo virtual, en español e inglés, con visibilidad e impacto de los artículos desde el inicio de la RPGO en 1955. Con datos actualizados del OJS sobre la RPGO, el número de visitas mensuales a los resúmenes llegan hasta 10 mil y las descargas mensuales de artículos en formato PDF hasta más de 9 mil. Y, en el ámbito de revistas científicas de ginecoobstetricia de América Latina y España en Scopus, destaca el índice h de la RPGO por Google Scholar Metrics, como una de las mejores. Al presente, y frente a los desafíos futuros, la actividad de la RPGO ha sido fortalecida, estableciendo un equipo editorial y herramientas que permiten la ya iniciada profesionalización de los procesos de la actividad editorial.

The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (RPGO, for its acronym in Spanish) has obtained its inclusion in the important Scopus database. A quick review of the journal's publication recalls the editorial dedication of its six editors, four of whom had just recently chaired the Peruvian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (SPOG, for its acronym in Spanish). The initial editorial work was carried out manually, on typewriters and continuously visiting the printing press, as well as the sponsors. The commitment of the SPOG Steering Committees to finance the publication and distribution of the issues allowed the gradual indexing to local, regional and international databases. Its internalization was expanded since the publication of the RPGO in the Open Journal Systems (OJS), a computer system where articles are published with punctuality, quality, including their editorial characteristics and the Information for Authors. Now the publication is only virtual, in English and Spanish, with visibility and impact of the articles since the beginning of the RPGO in 1955. With updated OJS data on the RPGO, the number of monthly visits to the abstracts reaches up to 10 thousand and monthly downloads of articles in PDF format reach more than 9 thousand. And, in the field of obstetrics and gynecology scientific journals in Latin America and Spain in Scopus, the h index of the RPGO by Google Scholar Metrics stands out as one of the best. At present, and facing future challenges, the activity of the RPGO has been strengthened, establishing an editorial team and tools that allow the already initiated professionalization of the processes of the editorial activity.

Nutrition impact symptoms, sarcopenia, and malnutrition in hospitalized patients / Sintomas de impacto nutricional, sarcopenia e desnutrição em pacientes hospitalizados

INTRODUCTION: Nutrition Impact Symptoms (NIS) are common in hospitalized patients and can be aggravated in the presence of malnutrition. OBJECTIVE: To verify the presence of NIS and its association with sociodemographic and clinical variables, sarcopenia phenotype, and nutritional status of individuals hospitalized. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study with hospitalized patients, of both sexes and ≥50 years old. Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), handgrip strength (HGS), gait speed GS), and anthropometric measurements were performed up to 48 hours after admission. NIS was obtained through PG-SGA and stratified into two groups: <3 and ≥3 symptoms. The chi-square test (χ2) was performed, and a 5% significance level was adopted. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients (65.4±9.67 years) were studied, with the majority of men (56.7%), older people (70.0%), married (68.9%), low economic class (72.2%), without work activity (70.5%), with two previous diseases (60.0%), overweight by body mass index (46.7%) and adequate adductor pollicis muscle thickness (83.3%). The most prevalent NIS were "dry mouth", "anorexia", and "smells sick" respectively 31.1%, 30.0%, and 16.7%. There was an association between NIS and SARC-F score (p=0.002), handgrip strength (p=0.016), the status of sarcopenia (p=0.020), PG-SGA (p<0.001), and economic status (p=0.020). CONCLUSION: The identification of NIS is common, and may infer negative nutritional status and functional performance of patients. The use of protocols to identify NIS during hospitalization should be considered to minimize the negative impact on nutritional status.

INTRODUÇÃO: Sintomas de impacto nutricional (SIN) são comuns em pacientes hospitalizados e estes podem ser agravados na presença da desnutrição. OBJETIVO: Verificar a presença de SIN e sua associação com as variáveis sociodemográficas, clínicas, fenótipo de sarcopenia e estado nutricional de indivíduos hospitalizados. MÉTODOS: Trata-se de estudo transversal com pacientes internados, de ambos os sexos e idade ≥ 50 anos. Realizou-se Avaliação Subjetiva Global produzida pelo Paciente (ASG-PPP), força de preensão palmar (FPP), velocidade de caminhada (VC) e medidas antropométricas até 48 horas da admissão. Os SIN foram obtidos por meio da ASG-PPP e compilados em <3 ou ≥3 sintomas. Realizou-se o teste de qui-quadrado (χ2). Adotou-se nível de significância de 5%. RESULTADOS: Um total de 90 pacientes (65,4±9,67 anos), sendo a maioria homem (56,7%), idoso (70,0%), casado (68,9%), classe econômica baixa (72,2%), sem atividade de trabalho (70,5%), com uma a duas doenças pregressas (60,0%), excesso de peso ao índice de massa corporal (46,7%) e adequada espessura do músculo adutor do polegar (83,3%). Os SIN "boca seca", "anorexia" e "cheiros enjoam" foram os mais prevalentes, respectivamente 31,1%, 30,0% e 16,7%. Houve associação dos SIN com as variáveis que compõem o fenótipo de sarcopenia: o escore SARC-F (p=0,002) e FPP (p=0,016), status de sarcopenia (p=0,020), ASG-PPP (p<0,001) e classe econômica (p=0,020). CONCLUSÃO: A identificação de SIN é comum, podendo inferir negativamente no estado nutricional e desempenho funcional dos pacientes. Considerar o uso de protocolos para identificação dos SIN durante a hospitalização a fim de minimizar a repercussão negativa no estado nutricional.

Investigaciones sobre COVID-19 y su influencia en el factor de impacto de las revistas médicas latinoamericanas / Research on COVID-19 and its influence on Latin American medical journals impact factor

Resumen Introducción: La llegada de la pandemia de la enfermedad por coronavirus (COVID-19) incrementó exponencialmente la producción científica. Objetivo: Analizar la influencia de la producción científica acerca de COVID-19 en los valores del factor de impacto de revistas médicas latinoamericanas. Métodos: Se emplearon las revistas de categorías relacionadas con la medicina del Journal Citation Reports (JCR). Se utilizaron los datos del factor del impacto de las ediciones de 2020 y 2021 para establecer una comparación respecto a las citas recibidas por los documentos relativos a COVID-19. Resultados: Se observó un descenso en los valores del factor de impacto de las revistas evaluadas cuando se eliminan las citas recibidas por los documentos relativos a COVID-19. Conclusiones: El volumen de la información publicada sobre COVID-19 y las citas recibidas influyeron en el aumento del impacto en el JCR de 2021.

Abstract Introduction: The arrival of the pandemic caused by coronavirus disease (COVID-19) exponentially increased scientific production. Objective: To analyze the influence of COVID-19-related scientific production on the impact factor values of Latin American medical journals. Methods: Journals related to the Medicine categories included in Journal Citation Reports (JCR) were used. Impact factor data from the 2020 and 2021 editions were used to compare the citations received by documents related to COVID-19. Results: A decrease in the impact factor values of the evaluated journals was observed when the citations received by works related to COVID-19 were eliminated. Conclusions: The volume of information published on COVID-19 and the citations received influenced the impact increase in 2021 JCR.

Relación entre la cuenta de Twitter @ascolcirugia y las publicaciones de la Revista Colombiana de Cirugía durante la pandemia / Relationship between the Twitter account @ascolcirugia and the publications of the Colombian Journal of Surgery during the pandemic

Introducción. Indicadores alternativos basados en la web 2.0 han tomado importancia para medir el impacto de la producción científica. Previamente se han demostrado correlaciones positivas entre indicadores tradicionales y alternativos. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar la relación de estos indicadores en el campo de la cirugía de nuestro país.Métodos. Análisis retrospectivo de las publicaciones de la Revista Colombiana de Cirugía y "tweets" de la cuenta @ascolcirugia entre marzo 2020 y julio 2021. Se evaluaron comparativamente los artículos con y sin publicación en la cuenta @ascolcirugia. Se determinó la correlación entre indicadores alternativos e indicadores tradicionales de las publicaciones de la revista. Resultados. En total se revisaron 149 artículos y 780 "tweets"; tan sólo el 13,4 % (n=20) de los artículos tuvieron visibilidad en la cuenta @ascolcirugia, con una mediana de 2 "tweets" (RIQ 1-2) por artículo, siendo la mayoría de estos sobre temas de COVID-19 (85 % vs 10 %; p<0,001). Los artículos publicados en @ascolcirugia tuvieron una mayor mediana de descargas (220 vs 116; p<0,001) y citaciones (3,5 vs 0; p<0,001) en comparación con los que no fueron publicados.Conclusión. El uso de las redes sociales tiene un efecto positivo en el número de lectores de la Revista Colombiana de Cirugía y el impacto académico de los autores. Aunque existe una buena correlación entre indicadores alternativos y tradicionales en el contexto nacional, la proporción de artículos de la Revista Colombiana de Cirugía publicados en la cuenta @ascolcirugia es baja.

Introduction. Alternative indicators based on web 2.0 have gained great relevance to measure the impact of scientific production. Positive correlations between traditional and alternative indicators have previously been shown. The objective of our article is to evaluate the relationship of these indicators in the field of surgery in our country.Methods. Retrospective analysis of the publications of the Colombian Journal of Surgery and tweets of the Twitter account (@ascolcirugia) during March 2020 and July 2021. Articles with and without tweets in the account @ascolcirugia were comparatively evaluated. The correlation between alternative indicators and traditional indicators of the journal's publications was determined. Results. A total of 149 articles and 780 tweets were reviewed; only 13.4% (n=20) of the articles had visibility at the @ascolcirugia account, with a median of 2 tweets (RIQ 1-2) per article, most of which were on COVID-19 issues (85% vs 10%; p<0.001). The articles published at the @ascolcirugia account had a higher median number of downloads (220 vs 116; p<0.001) and citations (3.5 vs 0; p<0.001) compared to the articles that were not published. Conclusions. The use of social media has a positive effect on the number of readers of the Colombian Journal of Surgery and the academic impact of the authors. Although there is a good correlation between alternative and traditional indicators, in the national context, the proportion of articles of the Colombian Journal of Surgery published at the @ascolcirugia account is low

Métricas de impacto y evaluación de la ciencia / Impact metrics and science evaluation

RESUMEN Los científicos siempre buscaron formas de evaluar los resultados de las investigaciones para reconocer y premiar sus esfuerzos, y para apoyar decisiones en programas y políticas públicas. Las medidas o métricas de impacto de la ciencia se transformaron, en las últimas décadas, en el motor propulsor del ambiente académico. Investigadores, revistas científicas, bases de datos y casas editoriales, instituciones de investigación y agencias de financiación tienen su trabajo gobernado por el impacto de la investigación que producen, publican, indexan, promueven y financian. Se utilizan largamente indicadores bibliométricos para la evaluación de la producción científica, a pesar de la falta de relación inequívoca entre citas y calidad, impacto o mérito científico. Además, cuando se considera la innovación, característica inherente de la investigación científica, la relación es todavía más desconectada. En este artículo se describen los tipos principales de métricas utilizadas para evaluar la producción científica, sus características, potenciales y limitaciones.

ABSTRACT Scientists have always looked for ways to evaluate research results to recognize and reward their efforts, and to support decisions regarding programs and public policies. The metrics of scientific impact have become, in recent decades, the driving force behind the academic environment. The work of researchers, scientific journals, databases and publishers, research institutions, and funding agencies is driven by the impact of the research they produce, publish, index, promote and finance. Bibliometric indicators are widely used for the evaluation of scientific output, despite the lack of a clear relationship between citations and quality, impact, or scientific merit. Furthermore, the relationship is even less evident regarding innovation, which is an inherent characteristic of scientific research. This article describes the main types of metrics used to evaluate scientific output, as well as its features, potentials, and limitations.

A comparison of scientometric data and publication policies of ophthalmology journals

Purpose: This retrospective database analysis study aims to present the scientometric data of journals publishing in the field of ophthalmology and to compare the scientometric data of ophthalmology journals according to the open access (OA) publishing policies. Methods: The scientometric data of 48 journals were obtained from Clarivate Analytics InCites and Scimago Journal & Country Rank websites. Journal impact factor (JIF), Eigenfactor score (ES), scientific journal ranking (SJR), and Hirsch index (HI) were included. The OA publishing policies were separated into full OA with publishing fees, full OA without fees, and hybrid OA. The fees were stated as US dollars (USD). Results: Four scientometric indexes had strong positive correlations; the highest correlation coefficients were observed between the SJR and JIF (R = 0.906) and the SJR and HI (R = 0.798). However, journals in the first quartile according to JIF were in the second and third quartiles according to the SJR and HI and in the fourth quartile in the ES. The OA articles published in hybrid journals received a median of 1.17?fold (0.15–2.71) more citations. Only HI was higher in hybrid OA; other scientometric indexes were similar with full OA journals. Full OA journals charged a median of 1525 USD lower than hybrid journals. Conclusion: Full OA model in ophthalmology journals does not have a positive effect on the scientometric indexes. In hybrid OA journals, choosing to publish OA may increase citations, but it would be more accurate to evaluate this on a journal basis

Indicadores bibliométricos: impacto y altmetrics para una evaluación amplia y equitativa de las revistas científicas de Colombia / Bibliometrics Indicators: Impact and Altmetrics for an Extensive and Equitable Assessment of Colombian Scientific Journals / Indicadores bibliométricos: impacto e altmetria para uma avaliação ampla e equitativa das revistas científicas colombianas

La medición y análisis de la calidad de las publicaciones científicas es de fundamental importancia para evaluar el progreso e impacto de investigadores, grupos de investigación y revistas científicas en la comunidad académica y la sociedad (1,2). Tradicionalmente, la evaluación se encomendaba a pares de reconocida trayectoria, idoneidad y prestigio. Sin embargo, para eliminar subjetividades, desde hace varios años se ha recurrido a indicadores bibliométricos que propenden por una calificación mensurable, objetiva y multidimensional (1,3). Los indicadores bibliométricos (IB) pueden definirse como cuantificadores de información bibliográfica, disponible en documentos científicos y académicos, susceptible de ser analizada en términos de producción y consumo (1,2). Existe una variada tipología de IB (1,2) en función del objeto a examinar (investigador, revista o grupo de investigación) y que en algunos casos son transversales a este. Así, los indicadores personales (edad, sexo y antecedentes de los autores) solo aplican a investigadores o grupos, mientras que los de productividad e impacto aplican también a revistas. Para estas, el indicador de productividad (cantidad) y, aún más, el de impacto ("calidad") son rutinariamente empleados para clasificarlas y compararlas con el propósito, cada vez más controversial, de medir su pertinencia y relevancia académica y/o social (4).

Measuring and analyzing the quality of scientific publications is fundamentally important for assessing the progress and impact of researchers, research groups and scientific journals in the academic community and society (1,2). Traditionally, this assessment was entrusted to peers with a recognized track record, eligibility and prestige. However, bibliometric indicators have been used for several years to eliminate subjectivity, which aim at a measurable, objective and multi-dimensional qualification (1,3). Bibliometric indicators (BI) can be defined as quantifiers of the bibliographic information available in scientific and academic documents susceptible to being analyzed in terms of production and consumption (1,2). There is a typological variety of BI (1,2) based on the object to be examined (researcher, journal or research group) and, in some cases, they are cross-sectional to it. In this way, personal indicators (age, gender and background of the authors) only apply to researchers or groups, while productivity and impact also apply to journals. For journals, the productivity (quantity) and, more so, impact ("quality") indicators, are routinely used to classify journals and compare them, with the increasingly controversial purpose of measuring their academic and/or social pertinence and relevance (4).

A medição e análise da qualidade das publicações científicas é de fundamental importância para avaliar o progresso e o impacto de pesquisadores, grupos de pesquisa e revistas científicas na comunidade acadêmica e na sociedade (1,2). Tradicionalmente, a avaliação era confiada a pares de reconhecida trajetória, idoneidade e prestígio. No entanto, a fim de eliminar subjetividades, há vários anos são utilizados indicadores bibliométricos que visam uma qualificação mensurável, objetiva e multidimensional (1,3). Indicadores bibliométricos (IB) podem ser definidos como quantificadores de informações bibliográficas, disponíveis em documentos científicos e acadêmicos, passíveis de análise em termos de produção e consumo (1,2). Existe uma tipologia de IB variada (1,2) dependendo do objeto a ser examinado (pesquisador, periódico ou grupo de pesquisa) e que em alguns casos são transversais a ele. Assim, os indicadores pessoais (idade, sexo e formação dos autores) se aplicam apenas a pesquisadores ou grupos, enquanto os de produtividade e impacto também se aplicam a periódicos. Para estes, o indicador de produtividade (quantidade) e, mais ainda, o indicador de impacto ("qualidade") são rotineiramente utilizados para classificá-los e compará-los com o propósito cada vez mais controverso de medir sua pertinência e relevância acadêmica e/ou social (4).

Impacto social e acadêmico da Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade / Social and academic impact of the Brazilian Journal of Family and Community Medicine / Impacto social y académico de la Revista Brasileña de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria

O fortalecimento da Medicina de Família e Comunidade e da atenção primária latino-americana requer, entre tantas outras coisas, a produção de periódicos científicos de alto impacto social e acadêmico. A Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade tem o potencial de ser um desses periódicos. Contudo, é complexa a tarefa de gerenciar e aumentar o impacto social e acadêmico de periódicos científicos de pequeno porte, com métricas modestas e/ou ligadas a áreas de pesquisa emergentes, como no caso Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade. Temos observado ao longo dos anos um aumento significativo do impacto científico dessa revista, a exemplo da elevação de seu Índice H5 (Google). Entretanto, ainda há muito trabalho à frente para alcançarmos indexações na Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Scopus e Web of Science. Este editorial é uma forma de mobilizar toda a comunidade acadêmica e assistencial em Medicina de Família e Comunidade e atenção primária a unir esforços para fortalecer a revista.

The strengthening of Family and Community Medicine and Primary Health Care in Latin America requires, among many other things, the production of scientific journals with high social and academic impact. The Brazilian Journal of Family and Community Medicine has the potential to be one of these journals. However, the task of managing and increasing the social and academic relevance of small journals, with modest metrics and/or linked to emerging research areas, as in the case of Brazilian Journal of Family and Community Medicine, is complex. Over the years, we have observed a significant increase in the scientific impact of this journal, such as the increase in its H5 Index (Google). However, there is still a lot of work ahead to achieve indexing in MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. This editorial is a way of mobilizing the entire academic and care communities in Family and Community Medicine and Primary Health Care to join efforts to strengthen the journal.

El fortalecimiento de la Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria y de la Atención Primaria de Salud en latinoamerica requiere, entre otras cosas, la producción de revistas científicas de alto impacto social y académico. La Revista Brasileña de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria tiene potencial para ser una de esas revistas. Sin embargo, la tarea de gestionar y aumentar el impacto social y académico de revistas científicas pequeñas, con métricas bibliométricas modestas y/o vinculadas a áreas de investigación emergentes, como en el caso de Revista Brasileña de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, es compleja. A lo largo de los años, hemos observado un aumento significativo del impacto científico de esa Revista, como el aumento de su Índice H5 (Google). Pero aún queda mucho trabajo por delante para lograr la indexación en MEDLINE, Scopus y Web of Science. Ese editorial es una forma de movilizar a toda la comunidad académica y asistencial de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria y Atención Primaria de Salud a unir esfuerzos para fortalecer la revista.

Analysis of articles and citation indexes in Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science / 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志

Objective:To analyze the changing trend of articles, authors and citation indexes in Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science(CJBMBS), so as to provide basis and guidance for further academic quality and editing and proofreading quality improving, and striving to build high-quality scientific and technological journal.Methods:Chinese Medical Journal Network and Wanfang database were used to obtain the information of articles published from 2009 to 2021.The citation indexes of the CJBMBS and the discipline journals of " neurology and psychiatry" were obtained from the natural science volume of the Citation Report (Core Edition) of Chinese Scientific and Technological Journals from 2002 to 2021.All data were analyzed by Excel 2010.Results:The CJBMBS published 187-314 articles per year from 2015 to 2021, and the annual number of articles decreased year by year.The average number of pages per article was 3.66-6.13 pages/article, showing an increasing trend year by year.Since 2015, the CJBMBS set up 3-7 key topics every year, and published 6.4%-16.2% articles of the annual.From 2009 to 2020, the average citation volume of magazine articles was 12.8-27.9, showing an increasing trend year by year.The average number of authors per article was basically stable at 4-6.From 2001 to 2020, the core impact factor of the CJBMBS was 0.188-1.327, with a wave like change and an overall upward trend.The total frequency of core citations was 155-2 836, with a rapid increase from 2001 to 2009, a stable at 2 500 from 2007 to 2017, and a downward trend after 2014.Compared with average level of the core journals of the discipline " neurology and psychiatry" , the core impact factor and the core total citation frequency of the CJBMBS from 2009 to 2020 were both significantly higher.From 2009 to 2020, the fund paper ratio of CJBMBS was 0.42-0.84, showing an upward trend.Conclusion:The citation indexes of CJBMBS are in the forefront of the discipline in recent years.In the future, we should pay more attention to the academic quality of papers and further expand the influence of the journal.

Os periódicos médicos brasileiros referenciam artigos nacionais? Um estudo transversal / Do Brazilian medical journals reference Brazilian articles? A cross-sectional study

Resumo Contexto A produção científica brasileira cresce de forma quantitativa e qualitativa a cada década. Entretanto, há uma desvalorização dos periódicos brasileiros demonstrada através da baixa quantidade de citações em comparação a textos de revistas internacionais, com justificativa subentendida de que há superioridade qualitativa de artigos estrangeiros. Objetivos Verificar a diferença entre o número de citações de periódicos nacionais e internacionais em três revistas brasileiras no período de 2016 a 2020. Métodos Foram analisados todos os artigos publicados na Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, no Jornal Vascular Brasileiro e na Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira no intervalo de 2016 a 2020. Os estudos selecionados tiveram suas referências avaliadas, sendo contabilizado o número total de citações e se eram provenientes de periódicos brasileiros ou de periódicos estrangeiros. Resultados Foram analisados 902 artigos, totalizando 23.394 referências, com média de 25,81 ± 8,59 por artigo. Nesse contexto, 2.680 (11,45%) eram nacionais, correspondentes a uma média de 2,95 ± 3,79 referências brasileiras por artigo. Conclusões Faz-se necessária a maior valorização dos periódicos brasileiros, em especial por parte dos pesquisadores nacionais e das instituições responsáveis pelo fomento da ciência.

Abstract Background The quantity and quality of Brazilian scientific output increases decade by decade. However, there is a tendency to undervalue Brazilian journals, illustrated by the low number of citations compared with texts in international journals, with the tacit justification that foreign articles are of superior quality. Objectives To investigate the differences in numbers of citations of Brazilian and international periodicals in three Brazilian journals from 2016 to 2020. Methods All articles published in the Journal of the Brazilian College of Surgeons, in the Jornal Vascular Brasileiro, and in Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira from 2016 to 2020 were analyzed. The references of these studies were analyzed, summing the total number of citations and classifying them as published in Brazilian or foreign journals. Results A total of 902 articles were analyzed, totaling 23,394 references, with a mean of 25.81 ± 8.59 references per article. Of these, 2,680 (11.45%) were Brazilian, equating to a mean of 2.95 ± 3.79 Brazilian references per article. Conclusions It is necessary to improve appreciation of Brazilian periodicals, especially among Brazilian researchers and institutions responsible for science funding.

Scientific production of Brazilian researchers focusing on oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology

Abstract We analyzed the distribution characteristics of the scientific production of Brazilian dentistry researchers of the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development. The Lattes curriculum data of 211 researchers from Oral Pathology, Oral Surgery, and Oral Medicine fields were included (2018-2020). Over their academic career, 39 researchers published 7,555 papers (average, 175 articles/researcher); 3,876/7,555 papers were indexed in the Web of Science. During 2018-2020, 1,440/7,555 (19%) papers were published. Brazilian dental researchers contribute significantly to international research by participating in scientific journals' editorial boards, evaluating research promotion agencies, training researchers, and contributing to scientific and technological development.

How to write medical abstracts? The rhetorical structure and phrases used in Epidemiology / Como escrever resumos da área médica? A estrutura retórica e frases usadas na Epidemiologia

Introduction: Abstracts are critical in medical contexts. They contain formulaic building blocks called Lexical Frames (LFs), which are high-frequency word sequences with variable slots that can be formed around collocation nodes. LFs are abundant in written academic discourse, and , for this reason, have great importance for the production of abstracts. Extensive research has been conducted on formulaic language, especially on medical genres. Fewer studies, however, have focused on LFs from specialty-specific corpora (.e.g., epidemiology) and their relationship with the rhetorical structure of abstracts. Objective: This study aims to fill this gap by describing the structure of epidemiology abstracts, presenting their rhetorical functions, and identifying the LFs that linguistically realize these functions to help researchers write more conventional abstracts. Methods: We put together three corpora of abstracts in the field, published in English in peer-reviewed journals, and combined genre analysis and Corpus Linguistics principles to identify the linguistic realizations of the rhetorical functions in the texts. First, the rhetorical structure was described; then, the LFs were identified and analyzed. Results: 92% of the texts follow a pre-established pattern, whose structure consists of five to nine sections. Eight saliently frequent nodes (study, result, method, conclusion, review, analysis, patients, and findings) around which the LFs are constructed were identified. Conclusion: Even though both the content and function words that make up the LFs show some variation, it is possible to notice that the LFs elicited typify the linguistic realizations of the corresponding sections' rhetorical functions and, thus, are suitable to the observation of a pattern. For that reason, the data obtained in this study were used to inform the creation of a support framework for the writing of specialty-specific medical abstracts.

Introdução: Resumos são cruciais em contextos médicos. Tais textos contêm blocos formulaicos do discurso acadêmico, denominados Estruturas Lexicais (ELes), sequências de palavras de alta frequência compostas de termos variáveis, organizados a partir de nódulos colocacionais. Estruturas Lexicais são abundantes no discurso acadêmico escrito, tendo grande importância para a produção de resumos. Extensas pesquisas já foram conduzidas acerca de linguagem formulaica, especialmente em gêneros médicos. Poucos estudos se concentraram em Estruturas Lexicais em corpora de especialidades (como epidemiologia) e sua relação com a estrutura dos resumos. Objetivo: Este estudo busca suprir a lacuna apontada descrevendo a estrutura dos resumos de epidemiologia, apresentando suas funções retóricas e identificando as Estruturas Lexicais que realizam essas funções, para promover escrita de resumos mais convencionais. Métodos: Compilamos três corpora de resumos no campo publicados em inglês em revistas indexadas e revisadas por pares e combinamos a análise de gênero e os princípios da Linguística de Corpus para identificar as realizações das funções retóricas dos textos. Primeiramente, a estrutura retórica foi descrita. Em seguida, as foram identificadas, extraídas e analisadas. Resultados: Do total, 92% dos textos seguem um padrão, composto de cinco a nove seções. Oito nódulos colocacionais frequentes foram identificados (study, result, method, conclusion, review, analysis, patients e findings), em torno dos quais as Estruturas Lexicais se constroem. Conclusão: Embora tanto as palavras que remetem a conteúdo quanto as que se referem a funções das Estruturas Lexicais apresentem alguma variação, é possível perceber que as Estruturas Lexicais tipificam as realizações linguísticas das funções retóricas das seções correspondentes (background & objectives, methods, results e conclusion) e são adequadas para a observação de um padrão. Os dados obtidos foram usados para informar a criação de um quadro para a redação de resumos da especialidade.